All three article today were very similar. All of them focused on Barrack Obama's "apology" for his earlier remarks calling people from small towns bitter. Barrack obama tried to explain the meaning behind his words and also admit that he may not have used the correct use of words in his statement. I didn't feel as if any of the newspapers were doing anything more than just relaying the facts and they did it in an unbiased way. The noticable differences were just that the Washington Post spent most of the article giving Obama's explanation and spent little time with the attacks from Clinton. The N.Y. Times gave a little more detail into Clinton's attack by providing lengthy quotes as well as a video from both Obama and Clinton giving their speeches. The L.A. Times had detailed quotes from Clinton's speech criticizing Obama. The three publications were all similar but I enjoyed the N.Y. the most because it offered visual aids with the videos of the candidates.
No comments:
Post a Comment