Three Publictions Contrasted

The New York Times

The New York Times focused the story on Senator Clinton and her ability to win key swing states. Sen. Clinton made a powerful argument that the states that she won are necessary for a democratic victory in November.

Senator Obama countered by saying that he still is in the best position to win the democratic race and that the little damage Sen. Clinton did was in vain.

The Times ended the article by touching on fund raising and campaign spending a reoccurring topic of debate since the start of the primaries.

The Los Angeles Times

Contrary to both other publications, the LA Times reported on Clinton's and Obama's hastily return to Capital Hill, to vote on a discrimination bill, following a brief stay in Indiana- the next stop in the race for president.

The attention then turned to Sen. Clinton's focus on superdelegates. She pleaded to the party for support stating that if Michigan and Florida were given the opportunity to vote, she would significantly close the gap in popular vote.

The Obama campaign countered the argument saying that Obama will be the great unifier. arguing that he will be the president that will close bipartisan conflict.

The Washington Post

Contrary to both other publications, the Post focused the entire article on the potential implications the democratic race is creating inside the party.